x402 | Conceptual Flow
0️⃣ Links to Check Out
1️⃣ A2A (Agent-to-Agent) — The Intent Layer
A2A answers: Who is talking to whom, and why?
What exists at this layer
- Autonomous agents
- Each agent has:
- A role (planner, executor, verifier, etc.)
- A wallet or payment authority
- A policy engine (budget, trust rules)
- Each agent has:
- Negotiation
- Price
- SLA
- Execution guarantees
- No humans in the execution path
Conceptual object
Agent {
id
capabilities
payment_policy
wallet_reference
}
Example A2A intent
“Agent A will pay Agent B 0.2 KAS if Agent B completes task X within 5 seconds.”
Important: At the A2A layer, no blockchain yet. This is pure intent + autonomy.
2️⃣ x402 — The Transport & Authorization Layer
x402 answers: How do agents ask for, authorize, and prove payment?
x402 adapts the familiar HTTP 402 Payment Required into an agent-native payment handshake.
How x402 fits A2A
Traditional HTTP
GET /resource
→ 401 Unauthorized
x402-style agent interaction
GET /task/execute
→ 402 Payment Required
With machine-readable metadata, not a PayPal link.
x402 responsibilities
x402 does NOT move money.
It:
- Describes payment requirements
- Establishes who must pay whom
- Encodes conditions
- References settlement proof
Think of x402 as:
“Authorization & negotiation glue” between agents and payment rails
x402 conceptual flow
Step 1: Request
POST /execute
Agent-ID: agent-A
Step 2: Challenge
402 Payment Required
X-Payment-Amount: 0.2 KAS
X-Payment-Recipient: kaspa:qxyz...
X-Payment-Condition: on-success
X-Payment-Deadline: 5s
Step 3: Proof submission
POST /execute
X-Payment-Proof: <signed tx | channel proof | escrow ref>
x402 is blockchain-agnostic. This is where Kaspa plugs in.
3️⃣ Kaspa BlockDAG — The Settlement Layer
Kaspa answers: How does value actually move, fast enough for agents?
Why Kaspa is unusually well-suited
Kaspa’s BlockDAG gives you:
- High throughput
- Low latency
- Parallel blocks
- Fast confirmations
- No global bottleneck
This matters because A2A payments are frequent, small, and time-sensitive.
Kaspa’s role in the stack
Kaspa provides:
- Final settlement
- Cryptographic proof
- Wallet ownership
- Anti-double-spend guarantees
Kaspa objects
Transaction {
from_address
to_address
amount
fee
timestamp
dag_inclusion_proof
}
Two Kaspa payment modes for A2A
🔹 Mode A: Direct On-Chain Micropayment
- Agent A signs a transaction
- Agent B verifies DAG inclusion
- Proof returned via x402
Good for:
- Low frequency
- High trust finality
🔹 Mode B: Pre-Funded / Escrow Pattern (recommended)
- Agent A pre-funds a Kaspa address or UTXO
- Agent B draws against it
- Final settlement later
Good for:
- Streaming payments
- Per-token billing
- Swarm agents
4️⃣ Full Stack Mapping (Side-by-Side)
| Layer | Role | What it Defines |
|---|---|---|
| A2A | Intent | Who pays whom and why |
| x402 | Protocol | How payment is requested, authorized, and proven |
| Kaspa BlockDAG | Settlement | Where and how value actually moves |
End-to-End Flow (Concrete)
Agent A (Planner)
└─ Needs transcription
Agent B (Transcriber)
└─ Responds with x402 challenge
(0.1 KAS, on success)
Agent A
└─ Signs Kaspa tx
└─ Sends tx hash + signature
Agent B
└─ Verifies DAG inclusion
└─ Executes task
└─ Returns result
5️⃣ Mental Model (Key Insight)
A2A is the “why” x402 is the “how” Kaspa is the “where value settles”
None replaces the others.
6️⃣ Why This Stack Is Compelling
Compared to Ethereum-centric stacks:
| Ethereum | Kaspa |
|---|---|
| Sequential blocks | Parallel BlockDAG |
| Congestion sensitive | Naturally scalable |
| Gas spikes | Predictable fees |
| Slower finality | Near-real-time confirmation |
For agent swarms and micro-tasks, Kaspa’s architecture is a natural fit.